Ohio

Operations:            Retail (Residential / Commercial / Industrial / Muni-Agg)

Generation / Wholesale

Brands:                     Dynegy (Retail)

Luminant (Generation / Wholesale)

Employees:             ~ 395

Customers:             Customer Count: N/A

Market Share: 9%

Generation Facilities:

Total: 5,132 MW

Listing by Fuel Type:

Coal: 2 facilities @ 2,320 (MW net capacity)

Gas: 4 facilities @ 2,719 (MW net capacity)

Oil: 2 facilities @ 93 (MW net capacity)

Ohio News

Vistra Assets in State

Facilities Map:
Facilities Details:
Asset Name Location Fuel MW HD SD CD Market Own %
Dicks Creek Monroe, OH Gas (CT) 155 53 4 8 PJM 100
Hanging Rock IRONTON, OH Gas (CCGT) 1,430 90 14 2 PJM 100
Miami Fort (CT) NORTH BEND, OH Oil 77 29 8 1 PJM 100
Miami Fort 7&8 NORTH BEND, OH Coal 1,020 29 8 1 PJM 100
Richland DEFIANCE, OH Gas (CT) 423 82 1 5 PJM 100
Stryker Stryker, OH Oil 16 81 1 5 PJM 100
Washington BEVERLY, OH Gas (CCGT) 711 78 30 6 PJM 100
Zimmer MOSCOW, OH Coal 1,300 66 14 2 PJM 100
Regional Office CINCINNATI, OH 32 9 1 100

Market Overview

Interconnection:

  • PJM

Competition Enabler & key statute(s):

  • Legislative –
  • Statute(s) –
  • Utility Regulations –

Utility Territories:

  • AEP Ohio
  • Dayton Power & Light (DP&L)
  • Duke
  • First Energy (FE)

Number of PUCO Certified Supplier (CRES) by Type:

  • Generating Company 39
  • Marketers (CRS) 114
  • Broker/Aggregators (AGG) 630
  • Governmental Aggregators (GAG) 345
  • Total 1,128

Number of Active CRES Providers by EDU Service Territory:

  • AEP 75
  • DP&L 49
  • DUKE 78
  • FE (CEI, OEC, TE) 64

Retail Competition Background:

Ohio adopted its version of “competitive electric restructuring” with the passage of Senate Bill 3 in 1999. This legislation initially froze electricity rates through 2005 and, for the first time, allowed retail customers of Ohio’s investor-owned electric utilities to shop for alternative suppliers of the generation portion of their electricity service.

Retail competition was slow to emerge in Ohio. Instead of allowing the competitive retail market to develop through the initial five-year “market development period” as had been contemplated by the Ohio General Assembly, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) and Ohio’s electric utilities developed “rate stabilization plans” (RSPs) that extended then-current rates for another two to three years (with adjustments for fuel and other non-bypassable generation-related costs). The RSPs essentially brought Ohio’s slowly developing competitive retail market to a halt except for very limited competitive opportunities.

Aggregation:

In Ohio, local communities are allowed, by law, to join their citizens together to buy electricity as a group and on the group’s behalf, negotiate the terms, conditions and price of the electric supply. These groups can result in “buying power” and a lower rate for the group members. Most governmental aggregation programs are “opt-out” programs which automatically enroll all local residents, unless they individually and actively opt-out of the program (i.e., choose not to be included). A local government can only do this if a majority of the voters approved the issue in a previous election.